• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?