• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?