• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?