#117725: "The new (as of Mach 16) display of cards is IMHO not as good as the old one."
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har en skjermdump av denne feilen (god kutyme), kan du bruke en bildelagringstjeneste (snipboard.io for eksempel) til å laste den opp og lime in lenken her. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i oversettelsessenteret? Hvis ja, har den vært oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har en skjermdump av denne feilen (god kutyme), kan du bruke en bildelagringstjeneste (snipboard.io for eksempel) til å laste den opp og lime in lenken her.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har en skjermdump av denne feilen (god kutyme), kan du bruke en bildelagringstjeneste (snipboard.io for eksempel) til å laste den opp og lime in lenken her. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i oversettelsessenteret? Hvis ja, har den vært oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
Rapporthistorikk
There was a deployment bug some hours ago which has been fixed, does the problem still persist now ?
I just finished a game (about midnight on the 17th, Central time) ; same behavior was present.
Note that this is not fatal; I can select the "synthetic" display mode and that does not seem to crowd out its neighbors.
If I switch into mobile view, they show up: i.imgur.com/xbTRG61.png
Also if I scroll down to my opponent's screen you can see that they're stacked like this guy was saying:
i.imgur.com/1CZjWju.png
It looks fine in Firefox on windows: 124.0.1 (64-bit)
I'm having this graphical issue in Linux: 115.9.1esr-1~deb12u1
Two solutions I've found are:
- Style bot and manually tweak the width to match what it needs to be
- Switch to Synthetic. It seems that it properly expands when in "synthetic" mode. Also the expansion isn't quite as necessary in this mode.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har en skjermdump av denne feilen (god kutyme), kan du bruke en bildelagringstjeneste (snipboard.io for eksempel) til å laste den opp og lime in lenken her.
){kind=link}
