#142674: "Path score chopped when half a path width covered by a card (not a diagonal situation this time)"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
34
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
34
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
34
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
34
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v128
Rapporthistorikk
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
