• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?