#163615: "Third dominance check. UI shows tie but points awarded as if no tie"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Mozilla v5
Rapporthistorikk
Russian was the dominant coalition. You were loyal to Russian.
You had 1pt for loyalty plus one patriot and one prize for three total points.
The Wakhan had 1pt for loyalty plus two prizes and one gift for four total points.
It is correct that the Wakhan score 5 and you score 3. It was not a tie.
The Wakhan only bought the gift the turn before so you may have missed this.
However, the summary scoring for the Wakhan does seem to be wrong. It shows only 3pts for Russian whereas it should show 4pts. The Afghan (2pt) and British (5pt) appear correct.
I’d look at move 68, for when she betrayed a card to gain a Russian patriot. That saw her summary score remain as 1, not increase to 2 as it should. She had only just radicalized that card as her first action in her turn and possibly that caused the error in her tally of influence, but I’m speculating.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
