Rapporter • Board Game Arena

Alle rapporter

cityofthebigshoulders_displayed rapporter

#23292: "Price Protection should be once per Decade and optional"

open: Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda

Hva handler denne rapporten om?

cityofthebigshoulders #109126807

Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg

Regler: en regel i spillet har ikke blitt respektert

Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg

Regler: en regel i spillet har ikke blitt respektert

Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne

Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detaljert beskrivelse

Rapporthistorikk

Aug 27 th 2020 23:51 • Joseph2302 • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Company owner should be given option on whether or not to use this tile
And it shouldn't work for the whole decade, as that is too powerful

Aug 28 th 2020 22:43 • mitcharf • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

I agree that it is a powerful capital asset, but it is not intended to work just once per decade. The designer clarified this on BGG here:
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/32703243#32703243

In terms of it being optional rather than mandatory, I'm trying to think of a case where I would NOT want to have my stock price protected from dropping. If there are legitimate cases where that would be of possible benefit, then it's worth pursuing that with the game designer, to see what he thinks. Otherwise it seems like it would needlessly delay the game if a player had to be prompted every time to see if they wanted to use it (especially since it can be used multiple times per decade)

Aug 29 th 2020 00:57 • arcadized • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

A player in that game asked the designer and the designer agrees this is bugged here:

www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/2493015/capital-asset-price-protection

Aug 29 th 2020 01:00 • arcadized • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

@mitcharf

Did you even read the link you posted? When I go there I see the designer has edited it to reflect the current version of the rules:

boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/32703243#32703243

also see the thread I posted:

www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/2493015/capital-asset-price-protection

IF you tool tip over the asset in BGA, you can see BGA is using the current version of the rules. this is a bug and the designer agrees

Aug 29 th 2020 05:00 • mitcharf • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

I've been participating in both of those threads. When I posted my comment here in the bug, it was before the designer had stayed that this was a change for the second edition. I was just coming here now to mention that I was mistaken in my previous comment, but I see you've beaten me to it.

Hopefully you also saw that I asked the designer about whether you can choose when to use this asset, and he replied that you do get to choose.

Aug 29 th 2020 16:52 • arcadized • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Ah, I see now. Sorry, looks like it was a timing issue. Didn't realize that was your thread, I don't use BGG very much. Thanks for coming back to correct the information here.

Aug 29 th 2020 17:18 • mitcharf • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

No problem. We all want the same thing here -- for the BGA version to implement the rules correctly. :)

Aug 30 th 2020 03:49 • ggohierroy • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Hey, so this adaptation was implemented when the 2nd edition rules were still being worked on, and the latest information I had at that time was that Price Protection was a passive ability that could be used multiple times in the same decade.

Now, I understand this has changed with the 2nd edition, but it wouldn't be easy to change with the implementation because it means multiple actions can be interrupted and switch to the player holding price protection because they now have a decision to make. This changes the flow of the game significantly, and in asynchronous games, this also has a big impact.

Just so you know, I have no intention of changing this in the short term because of those reasons. I'll leave it open for visibility.

Sep 12 th 2020 04:28 • alexsim • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

I think it would be reasonable to trigger the Asset automatically the first time it could be used. I can see where there would be edge cases where you wouldn't want it used, but I think the loss from automatically applying it would be less of a problem than letting it work all the time.

Sep 14 th 2020 02:02 • ggohierroy • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

@alexsim

Good idea, but knowing this, a player would use this knowledge to their advantage, making this capital asset go from amazing, to complete shit.

Dec 4 th 2020 22:51 • Neramoor • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Bug appeared in real time game. Price protection not exhausting during stock phase
imgur.com/a/kvZYdhh

Jan 3 rd 2021 00:19 • Nickelz • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Neramoor, the company that lost 3 steps is not the same as the company with the asset.

Jan 18 th 2021 13:48 • attagamer • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

The designer of the game has published a rewording of the capital asset effect on BGG:
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/35690787#35690787

I believe the BGA implementation is in accordance with this new/clarified rule.

Jan 19 th 2021 08:53 • attagamer • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Ooops, sorry! I meant that the BGA implementation is in accordance with the v1 rules.

Note the inconsistence between the behaviour (v1) and the tip text when hovering over the capital asset: the latter reflects the v2 rules!

The v2 rules have changed the ability of the capital asset, and the BGA implementation has thus become wrong.

Clarification by Mr Chandler (author) here: boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/35690787#35690787

He says: "In the Second Edition, this rule has changed to be a "ONCE PER DECADE" ability. It is no longer a passive ability."

Do not forget to grey out the capital asset once used.

Thank you for your time!

Apr 18 th 2021 20:28 • MrGeorge • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

So, to clarify, how do we use this asset to prevent the stock price from dropping during the stock phase?

Apr 22 nd 2021 03:10 • JohnOrigan • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:

Price protection is currently always enable (passive ability).

To follow the rules, it should protect only once (not implemented)

Legg til noe i denne rapporten

Legg til her noe som synes relevant for å reprodusere denne feilen eller forstå forslaget ditt:

En annen bord ID / flytt ID
Løste F5 problemet?
Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Avbryt Oppdater rapport

#23292: "Price Protection should be once per Decade and optional"

Hva handler denne rapporten om?

Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg

Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg

Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne

Detaljert beskrivelse

Rapporthistorikk

Legg til noe i denne rapporten

Endre rapportstatus til:

Hjelp

Bidra

Navigere

Følg oss