• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?