#25677: "For a nil bid, the partner's books are not added to team bid."
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
Move #417
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Move #417
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
Move #417
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
Move #417
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
Move #417
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
-
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Move #417
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
In this hand, one partner bid a nil. The other partner bid 6 books. The team made 8 books. Instead of crediting the team for the 6 books and losing the nil, they lost the nil, didn't make the bid, and also got 5 sand bags. So every book the partner who bid the nil received was counted towards the team's sand bags, but did not count towards the team's books. That is incorrect, and incredibly punitive. I hope that this was just an oversight.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v85
Rapporthistorikk
"The usual rule is that when a nil fails, the tricks won by the nil bidder do not count towards making the partner's bid, but do count as bags for the team."
I get that it's the usual rule, but it does seem to be pretty punitive
Further, if they DID, and if the non-zero partner also got MORE than they bid, then logically the zero player's tricks should ALSO count as bags within their partner's score. You can't have your cake AND eat it !
The tricks of the Partner do not count for the nil-bid and the tricks of the nil-player do not count for his partner.
Example:
Player 1 -> Bid 0 / Got 2 Tricks --> -100 for Nil-bid / 2 Bags (took more tricks than he/she bid)
Player 2 -> Bid 4 Got 5 Tricks --> 40 for Bid / 1 Bag (took more than bid)
Team --> - 60 Points / 3 Bags
This seems logical to me
I don't have any official ruling reference, but just wanted to address that the reasoning (initially reported as a bug) is not uncommon.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
