Alle rapporter
The Palaces of Carrara rapporter
#3166: "objective card IX: highest total building costs in each city"
fixed: Feilen har blitt fikset
1
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Regler: en regel i spillet har ikke blitt respektert
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
final scoring
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v43
Rapporthistorikk
Jun 18 th 2015 06:02 • senatorhung • Feilen har ikke blitt reprodusert av utviklerne enda:
The tooltip for objective card IX reads:
Final scoring:
The players add their building costs in each city.
For each city, the player(s) with the highest total receive(s) VPs for that city:
- Livorno 14 VPs
- Pisa 12 VPs
- Lucca 10 VPs
- Viareggio 8 VPs
- Massa 6 VPs
- Lerici 4 VPs
game example #1: 14559461
both players only built in lucca and lerici.
senatorhung had the highest building block count in lerici. hiker had the highest building count in lucca. my interpretation of the tooltip is that senatorhung should get 4 VPs for lerici, and hiker should get 10 VPs for lucca for that objective card. however, the displayed values at the end of the game for objective IX were senatorhung 44 VPs and hiker 50 VPs.
game example #2: 14508111
senatorhung had the highest building block count in lucca. hdp had the highest building block count in pisa, massa, and lerici. so by my understanding of the tooltip, that should have been senatorhung 10 VPs, hdp 12 + 6 + 4 = 22 VPs. however, the displayed values at the end of the game for objective IX were Hdp 44 VPs, senatorhung 32 VPs.
how are those numbers calculated ? are the values of the building blocks for each city somehow added to those listed on the card ?
Final scoring:
The players add their building costs in each city.
For each city, the player(s) with the highest total receive(s) VPs for that city:
- Livorno 14 VPs
- Pisa 12 VPs
- Lucca 10 VPs
- Viareggio 8 VPs
- Massa 6 VPs
- Lerici 4 VPs
game example #1: 14559461
both players only built in lucca and lerici.
senatorhung had the highest building block count in lerici. hiker had the highest building count in lucca. my interpretation of the tooltip is that senatorhung should get 4 VPs for lerici, and hiker should get 10 VPs for lucca for that objective card. however, the displayed values at the end of the game for objective IX were senatorhung 44 VPs and hiker 50 VPs.
game example #2: 14508111
senatorhung had the highest building block count in lucca. hdp had the highest building block count in pisa, massa, and lerici. so by my understanding of the tooltip, that should have been senatorhung 10 VPs, hdp 12 + 6 + 4 = 22 VPs. however, the displayed values at the end of the game for objective IX were Hdp 44 VPs, senatorhung 32 VPs.
how are those numbers calculated ? are the values of the building blocks for each city somehow added to those listed on the card ?
Jun 19 th 2015 00:18 • pikiou • Feilen har blitt fikset:
The game was taking into account cities in which there are were no buildings :/
This is now fixed, thanks for the detailed report!
This is now fixed, thanks for the detailed report!
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
Legg til her noe som synes relevant for å reprodusere denne feilen eller forstå forslaget ditt:
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
