#33628: "Tournament Final with a tie. Where is the rule that declares the winner?"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
-
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
No.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
-
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
No.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
-
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
No.
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
-
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
No.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
The players tied 127 x 127 in the tournament elimination final. Some thought the second player should win. There is also some thought the biggest ELO should win. That's not clear anywhere. What's BGA official logic to determine the winner?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v88
Rapporthistorikk
In international competitions, in case a match ands in a tie, the winner is the player who didn't start the match.
The logic behind it is that the first player gets to play one extra tile in the total of 71 us the starting tiles in the base name.
This criteria is well accepted in the community.
Here is the link to the game, thank you in advance
boardgamearena.com/table?table=535368672
Is this also valid for Arena matches?
In my opinion the change should only be used in single elimination tournaments.
In this swiss system tournament there were tied games both before and after the tiebreaker modification therefore some of these games ended with a real tie (0.5 points for both players) and some of them were won by one of the players:
boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=307099
I think we should agree that these kinds of rule changes should not happen during the course of a tournament.
Please improve so that the tiebreaker can be specified in the tournament settings. In Swiss system or round robin tournaments the tie does not necessarily have to be resolved.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
