#42906: "non-adjacent capture follows opponent's non-capture"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
Yes. Move 29-30
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
Yes. Move 29-30
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Microsoft Edge
Rapporthistorikk
> All your bugs which are adjacent to one or more enemy bugs of the same shape (but not necessarily the same orientation) must eat (capture) those enemy bugs
There is nothing here which says only the newest bug can eat, or that eating must happen after a bug is placed or grows. It's just based on adjacency and the possibility of being able to grow after!
We can probably help other users by updating the wiki rules to make this clear.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
