#61868: "End scoring result seems incorrect"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v99
Rapporthistorikk
Even though I ended with total score = 0, my Status still shows "get promoted to dead-end job", probably because I worked an extra shift (or the last shift?) in the last round.
The highest player only survives when the player is sole survivor or all surviving players perfectly tied.
My interpretation of the rules was that only players that worked too hard could get “promoted”.
This rule is quite relevant in multiplayer single round games, since players cannot bid 0 in single round games.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
