#72332: "improved layout for after-game dice statistics (with proposed mock-up)"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Firefox for Windows
Rapporthistorikk
In effect, the omission of the % symbol and the rounding to the nearest percentage point leads people to assume that a game had, perhaps 98 or 101 rolls, rather than 50 or 60 which is typical. Then you can do the math correctly and you find that the probability of no 9's being rolled is about 1 in 100,000, assuming 98 rolls per game. But on BGA, it occurs around once in 400 games (since the true number of rolls per game is usually 50 or 60). This can lead them to believe that the dice algorithm is either buggy or rigged.
Examples:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=125351#p125351
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=66082
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=67316
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=70809
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
