#7667: "Chief-in-power immediately getting a 2nd consecutive turn after eliminating a player"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. -
• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
Move 220 & Move 223
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Move 220 & Move 223
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. -
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
Move 220 & Move 223
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. -
• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
Move 220 & Move 223
-
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. -
• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
Move 220 & Move 223
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. -
• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
Move 220 & Move 223
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
-
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.
I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece. • Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v58
Rapporthistorikk
Move 225 & Move 227
It was from eliminating by a piece, so I may be misremembering.
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
