Alle rapporter
Turncoats rapporter
#79384: "tie game should be a loss for all, but someone won"
fixed: Feilen har blitt fikset
1
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Regler: en regel i spillet har ikke blitt respektert
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
tie game should be a loss for all, but someone won
-
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
end of game
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v109
Rapporthistorikk
Jan 19 th 2023 11:05 • MathieuV • Dette er ikke en feil:
Hey !
Thanks for your feedback. I'm pretty sure it's a misunderstanding; please let me know how it could be clearer.
At the end of the game, we see which faction wins then which player wins.
The winning faction is:
- the one with the greatest value on the crown track (~ number of controlled regions)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the axe track (~ number of battle actions taken during the game)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the flag track (~ number of march actions taken during the game)
There can be perfect ties; in which case "no faction wins".
The winning player is:
- the one with the most tokens in hand of the winning faction
- in case of a tie, the one with the least tokens in hand of losing factions
- in case of a tie, the earlier one in turn order
There cannot be perfect ties between players.
To be honest, I'm not perfectly sure about the last tie breaker between players.
I thought it was "the first player who started negotiations that ended the game" but after discussing with the designer it seems much simpler; the initial turn order breaks ties (kinda make sense; sucks to play first in an area control game).
Best Regards,
Mathieu
Thanks for your feedback. I'm pretty sure it's a misunderstanding; please let me know how it could be clearer.
At the end of the game, we see which faction wins then which player wins.
The winning faction is:
- the one with the greatest value on the crown track (~ number of controlled regions)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the axe track (~ number of battle actions taken during the game)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the flag track (~ number of march actions taken during the game)
There can be perfect ties; in which case "no faction wins".
The winning player is:
- the one with the most tokens in hand of the winning faction
- in case of a tie, the one with the least tokens in hand of losing factions
- in case of a tie, the earlier one in turn order
There cannot be perfect ties between players.
To be honest, I'm not perfectly sure about the last tie breaker between players.
I thought it was "the first player who started negotiations that ended the game" but after discussing with the designer it seems much simpler; the initial turn order breaks ties (kinda make sense; sucks to play first in an area control game).
Best Regards,
Mathieu
Jan 26 th 2023 14:24 • MathieuV • Feilen har blitt fikset:
Hey,
After further discussion with the designer, I got the last tie breaker for players wrong. It shall be ok now though.
Best Regards,
Mathieu
After further discussion with the designer, I got the last tie breaker for players wrong. It shall be ok now though.
Best Regards,
Mathieu
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
Legg til her noe som synes relevant for å reprodusere denne feilen eller forstå forslaget ditt:
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
