• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

Currently in Burgle Bros, the rules state you're not allowed to move "back and forth" in order to avoid drawing an event. However, it has been stated that this would be too difficult to code, and would result in false positives, and so (understandably), the devs focused on more productive things.

As a programmer myself, I spent some time analyzing the problem, as I knew I could tackle this, and I have the time to (unlike your devs :) ) and believe I have a draft solution which is a viable option as it:

1) doesn't result in false positives.
2) Simple coding logic changes to implement - nothing major, no redesign needed - you have all the info already, it's just a matter of gathering it up and using it properly.
3) flexible - so we can focus on the "simple"/obvious checks first .. and consider expanding to trickier ones later (if we want).

The logic is simple:

1) capture the current board "state" (everything, including tiles, hidden tiles, walls, player/guard positions, tools/loot positions, hack tokens .. alarms .. etc.) store it as a simple string (1 character per "item", ie Safe = "S", Walkway = "W", etc.)
2) boolean flag to indicate dice were rolled (ie safe, keypad, etc.) This provides a marker, as we won't compare board states beyond a dice roll. (think 1 move into a keypad, and failing the roll)
3) Compare latest board state with al previous ones up to a die roll event.
4) if any match, reject the move as "loitering" ..

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?