Alle rapporter
Khronos rapporter
#9130: "When I created a Junction between domains, the interface forced me to downsize buildings in a loop"
fixed: Feilen har blitt fikset
8
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Regler: en regel i spillet har ikke blitt respektert
Detaljert beskrivelse
-
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
Junction
-
• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
don't know move number
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome
Rapporthistorikk
Feb 10 th 2018 01:30 • Victoria_La • Utviklerne ønsker mer informasjon for å kunne reprodusere denne programfeilen:
If I don't know the move number I don't know what was the situation, also downsizing in a loop is possible
if your buildings will in violation of rule of hierarchy, so what rule was violated?
if your buildings will in violation of rule of hierarchy, so what rule was violated?
Feb 10 th 2018 01:39 • Victoria_La • Feil har blitt bekreftet av utviklerne:
If you taking about move 21, the downsizing was triggered 2nd time in Age of Faith, unfortunately
game allow allowed to select building which was not scheduled to be selected for downsizing
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #10 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #12 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Conflict of hierarchy detected
jdgreenbaum removed 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
jdgreenbaum picked building to downsize 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
At that moment you suppose to select building 10 and 12 and that was highlighted and some how
you managed to select a diffrent building from wrong age
game allow allowed to select building which was not scheduled to be selected for downsizing
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #10 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #12 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Conflict of hierarchy detected
jdgreenbaum removed 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
jdgreenbaum picked building to downsize 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
At that moment you suppose to select building 10 and 12 and that was highlighted and some how
you managed to select a diffrent building from wrong age
Feb 11 th 2018 17:36 • Hairry • Feil har blitt bekreftet av utviklerne:
At table #37602800, starting with move #25:
- Red constructs 'Hamlet #11' at Age of Might (10,4), which connects 4 dominions
- Conflict of hierarchy detected: red's Chapel #1, blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- According to rules, red's own Chapel #1 is downsized and removed automatically by the game
- Conflict of hierarchy still persists between blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- At this point, as no own buildings are involved, Red needs to choose the building to downsize
- Contrary to the rules, Red is able to choose ANY building on the map, not just the 2 involved in the conflict
- Red selects to downsize:
- 'Keep #13' at Age of Might (11,6)
- 'Watchtower #1' at Age of Might (12,5)
- 'Chapel #13' at Age of Might (5,10)
- 'Watchtower #11' at Age of Faith (5,10)
- and finally 'Chapel #10' at Age of Might (10,3)
Players must be limited to choose only buildings involved in the conflict.
- Red constructs 'Hamlet #11' at Age of Might (10,4), which connects 4 dominions
- Conflict of hierarchy detected: red's Chapel #1, blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- According to rules, red's own Chapel #1 is downsized and removed automatically by the game
- Conflict of hierarchy still persists between blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- At this point, as no own buildings are involved, Red needs to choose the building to downsize
- Contrary to the rules, Red is able to choose ANY building on the map, not just the 2 involved in the conflict
- Red selects to downsize:
- 'Keep #13' at Age of Might (11,6)
- 'Watchtower #1' at Age of Might (12,5)
- 'Chapel #13' at Age of Might (5,10)
- 'Watchtower #11' at Age of Faith (5,10)
- and finally 'Chapel #10' at Age of Might (10,3)
Players must be limited to choose only buildings involved in the conflict.
Feb 13 th 2018 01:09 • Victoria_La • Feilen har blitt fikset:
Yeah it was pretty bad as it allows cheating and removing an arbitrary building, fixed now
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
Legg til her noe som synes relevant for å reprodusere denne feilen eller forstå forslaget ditt:
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
