• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde

End of game

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

End of game

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?

End of game

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?

End of game

• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?

End of game

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?

End of game

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?

• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.

2nd tie breaker should go to next player who would've played, but it didn't. At bottom of scoring it says 2nd tie break goes to first player, which it also didn't. Waargh was next player who would've played and also first player. Both players had black stones only, and black was neither the winning nor losing faction.

• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?