#29018: "2x Multipliers don´t accumulate"
Hva handler denne rapporten om?
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Hva har skjedd, eller hva gjelder det? Vennligst velg
Vennligst sjekk om det allerede er en rapport om samme emne
Hvis ja, vennligst STEM på denne rapporten. Rapporter med flest stemmer er gitt PRIORITET!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detaljert beskrivelse
• Vennligst kopier/lim inn feilmeldingen du ser på skjermen, om mulig.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Vennligst forklar hva du ønsket å gjøre, samt hva du faktisk gjorde og hva som skjedde
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Hva ble vist på skjermen når du ble blokkert (Tom skjerm? Del av spillgrensesnittet? Feilmelding?)
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Hvilken del av reglene ble ikke respektert av BGA-tilpasningen
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Er regelbruddet tydelig i spilloggen? Hvis ja, Hvilket trekknummer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Hva var spillhandlingen du ønsket å gjøre?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hva prøvde du å gjøre for å trigge denne spillhandlingen?
• Hva skjer når du prøver å gjøre dette (feilmelding, meldingsstatus for meldingsfelt, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• På hvilket tidspunkt i spillet oppsto problemet (hva var den daværende spillinstruksjonen)?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hva skjer når du forsøker å gjøre en spillhandling (feilmelding, spillstatusfeltmelding, ...)?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Vennligst beskriv visningsproblemet. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Vennligst kopier / lim inn teksten som vises på engelsk i stedet for språket ditt. Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Er denne teksten tilgjengelig i translation system? Hvis ja, har den blitt oversatt i mer enn 24 timer?
• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
• Vennligst forklar ditt forslag nøyaktig og konsistent slik at det er så enkelt som mulig å forstå hva du mener.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken nettleser bruker du?
Google Chrome v86
Rapporthistorikk
His suggestion is to add a variant in which doublers "add" instead of "multiply". So, two doublers applied to the same word would result in 3x earnings instead of 4x.
I'm happy to implement this variant, since it's endorsed by the game designer. I think the "2x MAX" variant you describe goes a little two far, since it eliminates any benefit of achieving multiple doubler requirements, and thus reduces strategic options.
But I really think 3x the points is still too much.
Check the stats to see how many times a player that gets B and J together loses...
I even considered a "no doubles allowed" pre-game option. That would still be good, IMO.
So, the data I have doesn't indicate that doubler stacking is having a significant effect on win rate. It doesn't disprove it either, of course.
I'm not necessarily ruling out a "2x MAX" variant, but I'd like to start with the designer-approved "doublers add" variant first.
(Since I'm just the developer of this game on BGA, not the game designer, I don't feel comfortable introducing significant rule variants without evidence or approval.)
Legg til noe i denne rapporten
- En annen bord ID / flytt ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Oppstod problemet gjentatte ganger? Hver gang? Tilfeldig?
- Hvis du har et skjermbilde av denne feilen (alltid lurt) kan du bruke Imgur.com for å laste det opp og kopiere inn lenken til bildet her.